Psychosocial Intervention Psychosocial Intervention
Psychosocial Intervention 24 (2015) 155-65 - Vol. 24 No.3 DOI: 10.1016/j.psi.2015.07.005
Strengthening suicide prevention networks: Interorganizational collaboration and tie strength
Fortalecimiento de las redes de prevención del suicidio: colaboración interorganizativa y fuerza del lazo
Lauren Marie Mengera,, , Lorann Stallonesa, , Jennifer Eileen Crossb, , Kimberly Lynn Henrya, , Peter Yu Chenc,
a Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, USA
b Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, USA
c Department of Psychology, Auburn University, USA
Received 10 July 2015, Accepted 24 July 2015

One explanation for the continued high rates of suicide in the United States may be insufficient coordination between organizations involved in prevention. Therefore, the factors that promote interorganizational collaboration should be identified and fostered. Surveys were administered to 37 organizations involved in suicide prevention in one Colorado community to: (1) assess the nature of collaboration and (2) identify relationship strength indicators associated with different types of collaboration. Results were examined using social network and regression analyses. Organizations reported more sharing information and resources and sending and receiving referrals than developing service infrastructure and coordinating training and screening activities. Some types of organizations were more connected than others, and the influence of relationship strength indicators was mostly consistent across different types of collaboration. This study offers new insight into the structural and relational aspects of interorganizational collaboration in suicide prevention and may serve as a model to better understand networks within other community health settings.

  • Suicide prevention
  • Interorganizational collaboration
  • Social network analysis
  • Tie strength
  • Community safety net

Una explicación de la continuidad de las altas tasas de suicido en los Estados Unidos puede ser la insuficiente coordinación entre las organizaciones que participan en su prevención. En consecuencia debemos identificar y fomentar aquellos factores que promueven la colaboración entre organizaciones. Se encuestaron 37 organizaciones implicadas en la prevención del suicido en una comunidad de Colorado para (1) evaluar la naturaleza de la colaboración y (2) identificar indicadores de la fortaleza de las relaciones asociados con los diferentes tipos de colaboración. Los resultados se examinaron con análisis de redes sociales y análisis de regresión. En la relación entre las organizaciones fue más frecuente el intercambio de información y recursos, así como la derivación de usuarios, que el desarrollo de la infraestructura de los servicios, la coordinación de la formación o las actividades de detección. Unos tipos de organización estaban más conectadas que otras, y la influencia de los indicadores de intensidad de la relación eran en su mayor parte consistentes en los diferentes tipos de colaboración. Este estudio ofrece una nueva visión de los aspectos estructurales y relacionales de la colaboración interinstitucional en la prevención del suicidio y puede servir de modelo para entender mejor las redes en otros entornos comunitarios de salud.

  • Prevención del suicidio
  • Colaboración interorganizativa
  • Análisis de redes sociales
  • Fortaleza del lazo
  • Red de prevención comunitaria
NOTICE Undefined offset: 1 (includes_ws/librerias/utilidades.php[294])
NOTICE Undefined index: url (includes_ws/librerias/utilidades.php[295])
NOTICE Undefined index: pii (includes_ws/librerias/utilidades.php[310])

This research was made possible by funds provided by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment: Office of Suicide Prevention grant number SM059168-03 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not primarily represent the official views of SAMHSA.

American Association for Suicidology (AAS), 2012
American Association for Suicidology (AAS)
U.S.A. suicide: 2009 official final data
American Association of Suicidology, (2012)
Balkundi and Harrison, 2006
P. Balkundi,D.A. Harrison
Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance
Academy of Management Journal, 49 (2006), pp. 49-58
Berardo, 2009
R. Berardo
Generalized trust in multi-organizational policy arenas: Studying its emergence from a network perspective
Political Science Quarterly, 62 (2009), pp. 178-189
Boje and Whetten, 1981
D.M. Boje,D. Whetten
Effects of organizational strategies and contextual constraints on centrality and attributions of influence in interorganizational networks
Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1981), pp. 378-395
Borgatti et al., 2002
S.P. Borgatti,M.G. Everett,L.C. Freeman
Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis (version 6)
Analytic Technologies, (2002)
Brewe et al., 2012
E. Brewe,L. Kramer,V. Sawtelle
Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center
Physics Education Research, 8 (2012), pp. 1-9
Callaly et al., 2009
T. Callaly,M. Berk,S. Dodd
Suicidality: The challenge for public mental health services
Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 21 (2009), pp. 41-43
Carley, 1999
K.M. Carley
On the evolution of social and organizational networks
pp. 3-30
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2012
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Understanding suicide
Centers for Disease Control, (2012)
Coleman, 1990
J.S. Coleman
Foundations of social theory
Harvard University Press, (1990)
The Colorado Trust, 2009
The Colorado Trust
Preventing suicide in Colorado: Progress achieved and goals for the future
Mental Health of America, (2009)
Comfort, 1999
L.K. Comfort
Shared risk: Complex systems in seismic response
Pergamon, (1999)
Cooper et al., 2006
S.L. Cooper,D. Lezotte,J. Jacobellis,C. DiGuiseppi
Does availability of mental health resources prevent recurrent suicidal behavior? An ecological analysis
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 36 (2006), pp. 409-417
Corteville and Sun, 2009
L. Corteville,M. Sun
An interorganizational social network analysis of the Michigan Diabetes Outreach Networks: Measuring relationships in community networks
Michigan Department of Community Health, (2009)
Cross et al., 2009
J.E. Cross,E. Dickmann,R. Newman-Gonchar,J.M. Fagan
Using mixed-method design and network analysis to measure development of interagency collaboration
American Journal of Evaluation, 30 (2009), pp. 310-329
Feinberg et al., 2005
M.A. Feinberg,N.R. Riggs,M.T. Greenberg
Social networks and community prevention coalitions
The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26 (2005), pp. 279-298
Fleury and Mercier, 2002
M.J. Fleury,C. Mercier
Integrated local networks as a model for organizing mental health services
Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 30 (2002), pp. 55-73
Fountoulakis et al., 2010
K.N. Fountoulakis,X. Gonda,Z. Rihmer
Suicide prevention programs through community intervention
Journal of Affective Disorders, 130 (2010), pp. 10-16
Fried et al., 1998
B.J. Fried,M.C. Johnsen,B.E. Starrett,M.O. Calloway,J.P. Morrissey
An empirical assessment of rural community support networks for individuals with severe mental disorders
Community Mental Health Journal, 34 (1998), pp. 39-56
Granovetter, 2005
M. Granovetter
The impact of social structure on economic outcomes
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (2005), pp. 33-50
Green et al., 2008
B.L. Green,A. Rockhill,S. Burrus
The role of interagency collaboration for substance abusing families involved in child welfare
Child Welfare, 81 (2008), pp. 29-61
Greenberg and Rosenheck, 2010
G.A. Greenberg,R.A. Rosenheck
An evaluation of an initiative to improve coordination and service delivery of homeless services networks
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 37 (2010), pp. 184-196
Hanneman and Riddle, 2005
R. Hanneman,M. Riddle
Introduction to social network methods
University of California, (2005)
Hardin, 1982
R. Hardin
Collective action
Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, (1982)
Hoven et al., 2010
C.W. Hoven,D.J. Mandell,J.M. Bertolote
Prevention of mental ill-health and suicide: Public health perspectives
European Psychiatry, 25 (2010), pp. 252-258
Ingram and Roberts, 2000
P. Ingram,P. Roberts
Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry
American Journal of Sociology, 106 (2000), pp. 387-423
Kilduff and Brass, 2010
M. Kilduff,D.J. Brass
Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates
pp. 317-357
Krackhardt, 1990
D. Krackhardt
Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 342-369
Krackhardt and Stern, 1988
D. Krackhardt,R.N. Stern
Informal networks and interorganizational crises: An experimental simulation
Social Psychology Quarterly, 51 (1988), pp. 123-140
Lazega et al., 2008
E. Lazega,M.T. Jourda,L. Mounier,R. Stoufer
Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design
Social Networks, 20 (2008), pp. 157-176
Lee et al., 2012
H.W. Lee,P.J. Robertson,L. Lewis,D. Sloane,L. Galloway-Gilliam,J. Nomachi
Trust in a cross-sectional interorganizational network: An empirical investigation of antecedents
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41 (2012), pp. 609-631
Lubell, 2007
M. Lubell
Familiarity breeds trust: Collective action in a policy domain
Journal of Politics, 69 (2007), pp. 237-250
Luque et al., 2010
J. Luque,D. Martinez Tyson,J.H. Lee,C. Gwede,S. Vadaparampil,S. Noel-Thomas
Using social network analysis to evaluate community capacity building of a regional community cancer network
Journal of Community Psychology, 38 (2010), pp. 656-668
McEvily et al., 2003
B. McEvily,V. Perrone,A. Zaheer
Trust as an organizing principle
Organization Science, 14 (2003), pp. 91-103
Okamoto, 2001
S.K. Okamoto
Interagency collaboration with high-risk gang youth
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 18 (2001), pp. 5-19
Ostrom, 1990
E. Ostrom
Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action
Cambridge University Press, (1990)
Pina-Stranger and Lazega, 2011
A. Pina-Stranger,E. Lazega
Bringing personalized ties back in: Their added value for biotech entrepreneurs and venture capitalists interorganizational networks
The Sociological Quarterly, 52 (2011), pp. 268-292
Provan et al., 2007
K.G. Provan,A. Fish,J. Sydow
Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks
Journal of Management, 33 (2007), pp. 479-516
Provan et al., 2005a
K.G. Provan,J. Harvey,J.G. de Zapien
Network structure and attitudes toward collaboration in a community partnership for diabetes control on the US-Mexican border
Journal of Health Organization and Management, 19 (2005), pp. 504-518
Provan and Milward, 1995
K.G. Provan,H.B. Milward
A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems
Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (1995), pp. 1-33
Provan and Milward, 2001
K.G. Provan,H.B. Milward
Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks
Public Administration Review, 61 (2001), pp. 414-423
Provan et al., 2005b
K.G. Provan,M.A. Veazie,L.K. Staten,N.I. Teufel-Shone
The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships
Public Administration Review, 65 (2005), pp. 603-612
Provan et al., 2004
K.G. Provan,M.A. Veazie,N.I. Teufel-Shone,C. Huddleston
Network analysis as a tool for assessing and building community collaboration for provision of chronic disease services
Health Promotion Practice, 5 (2004), pp. 174-182
Reagans and McEvily, 2003
R. Reagans,B. McEvily
Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range
Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2003), pp. 240-267
Saewyc et al., 2008
E.M. Saewyc,W. Solsvig,L. Edinburgh
The Hmong Youth Task Force: Evaluation of a coalition to address the sexual exploitation of young runaways
Public Health Nursing, 25 (2008), pp. 69-76
Sloper, 2004
P. Sloper
Facilitators and barriers for co-ordinated multi-agency services
Child: Care, Health & Development, 30 (2004), pp. 571-580
Soesters and van Iterson, 2002
J. Soesters,A. van Iterson
Blame and praise gossip in organizations: Established outsiders and the civilizing process
The civilized organization: Nobert Elias and the future of organization studies, pp. 25-40
Steiger, 1980
J. Steiger
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Psychological Bulletin, 87 (1980), pp. 245-251
Tabachnick and Fidell, 2007
B.G. Tabachnick,L.S. Fidell
Using multivariate statistics
Allyn & Bacon, (2007)
DHHS, 2012
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
National strategy for suicide prevention: Goals and objectives for action
Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, (2012, September)
Uzzi, 1997
B. Uzzi
Social structure and competitiveness in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness
Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1997), pp. 35-67
Van Eyk and Baum, 2002
H. Van Eyk,F. Baum
Learning about interagency collaboration: Trialling collaborative projects between hospitals and community health services
Health and Social Care in the Community, 10 (2002), pp. 262-269
World Health Organization (WHO), 2012
World Health Organization (WHO)
Suicide prevention (SUPRE): The problem
Zhang and Zhang, 2005
S.X. Zhang,L. Zhang
An experimental study of the Los Angeles county repeat offender prevention program: Its implementation and evaluation
Criminology and Public Policy, 4 (2005), pp. 205-236
WARNING Invalid argument supplied for foreach() (includes_ws/librerias/html/item.php[1199])
Copyright © 2015. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid
Psychosocial Intervention 24 (2015) 155-65 - Vol. 24 No.3 DOI: 10.1016/j.psi.2015.07.005